Mr. Malik writes that YouTube is reportedly not making as much money as it should and if that’s true, I’m sure there are a battalion of Googlers remedying that situation (or trying to), so I won’t pontificate about that. (OK, I will, a bit). We’ve already gone on record as saying that in our estimation, advertisers want premium safe content, in a safe environment, and we’ve got tons of that. But what struck me as more interesting was the last two sentences, reproduced here for your reading pleasure - “In comparison, the number of visitors to YouTube continues to rise, making it by far the most dominant player in the market. So much so that even Hulu decided to set up a channel on YouTube to attract traffic to their site.”
Even Hulu he writes. I’m not sure how to interpret that, since CBS and others have been populating trailers of their content for some time now in an attempt to drive traffic to their destination site. In fact, at iMedia last week, Patrick Keane of CBS went on about how CBS are purchasing and producing made-for-the-web shows and populating YouTube and other sites in order to drive traffic to CBS’s audience network.
OK, now I’ll finally get to my point, which is this whole concept of seeding the online-ether with teasers that point to the real meaty content that people want to watch, presumably at your destination site or your “affiliate or audience” network, is an interesting tactic that will only increase and morph. Already there are several companies with search technologies that will promote your content on search engines, RSS Feeds and the like to get your “page-rank” higher. What I wonder is whether this method of getting more viewers is as affective, more effective or complementary to a straightforward syndication of your content to known partner sites.
- Jayant Kadambi